Model comparison · YOLOv9 vs YOLOv8

YOLOv9 vs YOLOv8

A size-tier-by-size-tier comparison of YOLOv9 and Ultralytics YOLOv8: published COCO accuracy, parameter counts, licensing and which one to reach for. Every figure is the model authors' own, linked to its source.

CompareYOLOv9
AgainstYOLOv8
42%fewer params

mAP comparison

YOLOv9YOLOv8
34.540.546.552.558.5mAPNanoSmallMediumLargeExtra largeModel size tierYOLOv9t: 38.3 mAP, 2M paramsYOLOv9s: 46.8 mAP, 7.2M paramsYOLOv9m: 51.4 mAP, 20.1M paramsYOLOv9c: 53.0 mAP, 25.5M paramsYOLOv9e: 55.6 mAP, 58.1M paramsYOLOv8n: 37.3 mAP, 3.2M paramsYOLOv8s: 44.9 mAP, 11.2M paramsYOLOv8m: 50.2 mAP, 25.9M paramsYOLOv8l: 52.9 mAP, 43.7M paramsYOLOv8x: 53.9 mAP, 68.2M params

YOLOv9

  • Nano 38.3
  • Small 46.8
  • Medium 51.4
  • Large 53.0
  • Extra large 55.6

YOLOv8

  • Nano 37.3
  • Small 44.9
  • Medium 50.2
  • Large 52.9
  • Extra large 53.9
COCO mAP at 640px, as published by each model’s authors. The y axis spans 34.5 to 58.5 rather than starting at zero, so small differences stay visible. Points are the published checkpoints; the joining lines are for reading order only.

Accuracy and size, tier by tier

Each row pairs the equivalent rung of both size ladders, so the numbers sit side by side at comparable capacity. Every figure is the model authors’ own.

  • COCO mAP50-95 @ 640px
  • mAP: higher is better
  • Params (M): lower is better
YOLOv9 and YOLOv8 compared at each size tier: published COCO mAP50-95 at 640px and parameter counts in millions.
TierYOLOv9YOLOv8Δ mAP
ModelmAPParamsModelmAPParams
NanoYOLOv9t38.32.0MYOLOv8n37.33.2M+1.0
SmallYOLOv9s46.87.2MYOLOv8s44.911.2M+1.9
MediumYOLOv9m51.420.1MYOLOv8m50.225.9M+1.2
LargeYOLOv9c53.025.5MYOLOv8l52.943.7M+0.1
Extra largeYOLOv9e55.658.1MYOLOv8x53.968.2M+1.7

Δ mAP is YOLOv9 minus YOLOv8: positive means YOLOv9 is ahead at that tier. Sources: YOLOv9 docs · YOLOv9 paper · YOLOv8 docs

Additional information

  • YOLOv9 posts the higher published COCO mAP at all 5 matched size tiers, averaging 1.18 mAP ahead of YOLOv8. The gap is widest at the small tier, where YOLOv9 leads by 1.9 mAP. At the top of each range, YOLOv9 reaches 55.6 mAP against 53.9.

  • 42% fewer parameters, same accuracy. YOLOv9c reaches 53.0 mAP from 25.5M parameters, matching or beating YOLOv8l at 52.9 mAP from 43.7M.

    Parameter count is not latency. It is a good proxy for download size and memory, but throughput depends on your hardware, batch size and export format, so measure on your own target.

YOLOv9

Fixes deep-network information loss with PGI and GELAN.

Released
2024 · Academia Sinica (Wang et al.)
License
GPL-3.0
Framework
Original repo + Ultralytics (PyTorch)
Tasks
Detect, Segment

Adds Programmable Gradient Information and the GELAN backbone to preserve detail through deep layers, reaching high accuracy with very few parameters.

Download YOLOv9 weights →

YOLOv8

The workhorse that made anchor-free multi-task YOLO mainstream.

Released
2023 · Ultralytics
License
AGPL-3.0
Framework
Ultralytics (PyTorch)
Tasks
Detect, Segment, Classify, Pose, OBB

The anchor-free model that made multi-task YOLO mainstream: one architecture for detection, segmentation, pose, classification and OBB, with the largest ecosystem.

Download YOLOv8 weights →

YOLOv9 and YOLOv8 against the whole lineage

YOLOv9 and YOLOv8 against every other detector here, on one shared scale. The rest are dimmed; hover any row to bring it back.

Every YOLO detector in this section, with release year, publisher, published COCO mAP50-95 range at 640px, parameter-count range and licence.
ModelReleasedmAP rangeParams rangeLicence
YOLO26202640.9 to 57.52.4M to 55.7MAGPL-3.0
YOLO12202540.6 to 55.22.6M to 59.1MAGPL-3.0
YOLO11202439.5 to 54.72.6M to 56.9MAGPL-3.0
YOLOv10202438.5 to 54.42.3M to 29.5MAGPL-3.0
YOLOv9202438.3 to 55.62.0M to 58.1MGPL-3.0
YOLOv8202337.3 to 53.93.2M to 68.2MAGPL-3.0
YOLOv5 (v5u)202034.3 to 53.22.6M to 97.2MAGPL-3.0

Licenses here cover the weights. Running either model through the Ultralytics package brings AGPL-3.0 with it, and that can reach your own application regardless of how the checkpoint itself is licensed. Check the terms against your distribution plan before you ship.